Studies 1 to 7
- 1Who is Uzziah's father?The contradictionsMatthew 1.8
- 2The colt and the donkey?The contradictionsMark 11.7
- 3Peter's discovery?The contradictionsMatthew 16.15-17
- 4The meeting of Jesus and Peter?The contradictionsMatthew 4.18-22
- 5Jairus's daughterThe contradictionsMatthew 9.18
- 6John the Baptist risen?The contradictionsMatthew 14.1-2
- 7In what language did Jesus speak?The contradictionsMatthew 27.46
-
CTD005
Who is Uzziah's father?
This article explores the apparent contradiction between Matthew 1:8 and 2 Chronicles 26:1 concerning Uzziah's father. Although Matthew names Joram as Uzziah's father, 2 Chronicles identifies him as Amaziah. The term 'son' can refer to a distant descendant, and Matthew's genealogies are shortened for theological reasons.
2 Timothy 3.16 (King James Version) :All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD011
The colt and the donkey?
Article CTD011 responds to an alleged contradiction about the number of animals at Jesus' entry into Jerusalem. Mark and Luke mention a colt, while Matthew mentions a donkey and her colt. The author shows that this is not a contradiction but a difference of focus: Matthew, writing for a Jewish audience, emphasizes the literal fulfillment of the prophecy in Zechariah 9.9. Jesus rode only one animal, the colt, but the donkey's presence is mentioned for its prophetic and practical context.
Mark 11.7 (King James Version) :And they brought the colt to Jesus, and cast their garments on him; and he sat upon him.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD012
Peter’s discovery?
Article CTD012 addresses an alleged contradiction between John 1.41 and Matthew 16.17 concerning Peter's discovery of Jesus' messianic identity. These two passages actually describe two complementary stages: an initial human announcement made by Andrew, followed by an inward divine revelation confirmed by Jesus himself. Peter's faith is a gradual journey, not a single event.
John 2.22 (King James Version) :When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD013
Jesus’ meeting with Peter?
Article CTD013 addresses a classic objection: where did Jesus first meet Peter and Andrew? Matthew places the encounter in Galilee, John on the banks of the Jordan. The article demonstrates that these are two distinct stages: an initial encounter in Judea (John), followed by a definitive call in Galilee (Matthew). The two accounts are complementary, not contradictory, and illustrate the gradual development of the disciples' calling.
Matthew 4.19 (King James Version) :And he saith unto them, Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD014
Jairus' daughter
Article CTD014 examines the alleged contradiction between Matthew 9.18 and Mark 5.23 concerning the condition of Jairus's daughter. Matthew says she is dead, Mark that she is dying. The analysis shows that these accounts are complementary: Mark describes a narrative progression in which the death occurs along the way, while Matthew condenses the event by presenting the final condition directly. There is no contradiction, but two distinct editorial styles recounting the same miracle.
Mark 5.24 (King James Version) :And Jesus went with him; and much people followed him, and thronged him.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD016
John the Baptist risen from the dead?
Article CTD016 examines the alleged contradiction between Matthew 14.2, Mark 6.14 and Luke 9.7-9 concerning Herod Antipas' opinion of Jesus. Luke portrays Herod as uncertain, while Matthew and Mark report his private statement identifying Jesus with John the Baptist raised from the dead. The author demonstrates that there is no contradiction but a complementary narrative, explained by the publishing constraints of the first century.
Mark 6.14 (King James Version) :And king Herod heard of him; (for his name was spread abroad:) and he said, That John the Baptist was risen from the dead, and therefore mighty works do shew forth themselves in him.King James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org -
CTD043
In which language did Jesus speak?
Article CTD043 addresses the alleged contradiction between Matthew (“Eli, Eli…”) and Mark (“Eloï, Eloï…”) regarding Jesus’ cry on the cross. Linguistic analysis shows that Jesus spoke Aramaic (as evidenced by “sabachthani” in both texts) and that the difference between “Eli” (the Hebrew form) and “Eloï” (the Aramaic form) simply reflects each evangelist’s adaptation to his readership. There is no contradiction.
Psalms 22.1 (King James Version) :My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? why art thou so far from helping me, and from the words of my roaring?NoteAijeleth…: or, the hind of the morningNotehelping…: Heb. my salvationKing James Version (1769), domaine public — texte : eBible.org